as one with the heritage of a poor man [perozeboti], as Mordecai had been Haman’s slave master and was aware of Haman’s lowly lineage. Rav Pappa said: And he was called: The slave who was sold for a loaf of bread.

Haman’s previously quoted statement: ''Yet all this avails me nothing'' (Esther 5:13), teaches that all the treasures of that wicked one were engraved on his heart, and when he saw Mordecai sitting at the king’s gate, he said: As long as Mordecai is around, all this that I wear on my heart avails me nothing.

And Rabbi Elazar further said that Rabbi Ḥanina said: In the future, the Holy One, Blessed be He, will be a crown on the head of each and every righteous man. As it is stated: ''In that day shall the Lord of hosts be for a crown of glory, and for a diadem of beauty, to the residue of His people'' (Isaiah 28:5). What is the meaning of ''for a crown of glory [tzevi], and for a diadem [velitzefirat] of beauty''? A crown for those that do His will [tzivyono] and a diadem for those that await [velamtzapin] His glory. One might have thought that this extends to all such individuals. Therefore, the verse states: ''To the residue of his people,'' to whoever regards himself as a remainder, i.e., small and unimportant like residue. But whoever holds himself in high esteem will not merit this.

Apropos the quotation from Isaiah, the Gemara explains the following verse, which states: ''And for a spirit of justice to him that sits in judgment and for strength to them that turn back the battle to the gate'' (Isaiah 28:6). ''And for a spirit of justice''; this is referring to one who brings his evil inclination to trial and forces himself to repent. ''To him that sits in judgment''; this is referring to one who judges an absolutely true judgment. ''And for strength''; this is referring to one who triumphs over his evil inclination. ''Them that turn back the battle''; this is referring to those that give and take in their discussion of halakha in the battle of understanding the Torah. ''To the gate''; this is referring to the Torah scholars who arrive early and stay late at the darkened gates of the synagogues and study halls.

The Gemara continues with an episode associated with a verse in Isaiah. The Attribute of Justice said before the Holy One, Blessed be He: Master of the Universe, how are these, referring to the Jewish people, different from those, the other nations of the world, such that God performs miracles only on behalf of the Jewish people? The Holy One, Blessed be He, said to it: The Jewish people occupied themselves with Torah, whereas the other nations of the world did not occupy themselves with Torah.

The Attribute of Justice said to Him: ''These also reel through wine, and stagger through strong drink; the priest and the prophet reel through strong drink, they are confused because of wine, they stagger because of strong drink; they reel in vision, they stumble [paku] in judgment [peliliyya]'' (Isaiah 28:7). The word paku in this context is referring only to Gehenna, as it is stated: ''That this shall not be a cause of stumbling [puka] to you'' (I Samuel 25:31), and the word peliliyya here is referring only to judges, as it is stated: ''And he shall pay as the judges determine [bifelilim]'' (Exodus 21:22). The response of the Attribute of Justice was essentially that the Jewish people have also sinned and are consequently liable to receive punishment.

§ The Gemara returns to its explanation of the verses of the Megilla. The verse states with regard to Esther: ''And she stood in the inner court of the king’s house'' (Esther 5:1). Rabbi Levi said: Once she reached the chamber of the idols, which was in the inner court, the Divine Presence left her. She immediately said: ''My God, my God, why have You forsaken me?'' (Psalms 22:2). Perhaps it is because You judge an unintentional sin as one performed intentionally, and an action done due to circumstances beyond one’s control as one done willingly.

Or perhaps You have left me because in my prayers I called Haman a dog, as it is stated: ''Deliver my soul from the sword; my only one from the hand of the dog'' (Psalms 22:21). She at once retracted and called him in her prayers a lion, as it is stated in the following verse: ''Save me from the lion’s mouth'' (Psalms 22:22).

The verse states: ''And so it was, that when the king saw Esther the queen standing in the court, that she obtained favor in his sight; and the king held out to Esther the golden scepter that was in his hand'' (Esther 5:2). Rabbi Yoḥanan said: Three ministering angels happened to join her at that time: One that raised up her neck, so that she could stand erect, free of shame; one that strung a cord of divine grace around her, endowing her with charm and beauty; and one that stretched the king’s scepter.

How much was it stretched? Rabbi Yirmeya said: The scepter was two cubits, and he made it twelve cubits. And some say that he made it sixteen cubits, and yet others say twenty-four cubits. It was taught in a baraita: He made it sixty cubits. And similarly you find with the arm of Pharaoh’s daughter, which she stretched out to take Moshe. And so too, you find with the teeth of the wicked, as it is written: ''You have broken the teeth of the wicked'' (Psalms 3:8), with regard to which Reish Lakish said: Do not read it as ''You have broken [shibbarta],'' but as: You have enlarged [sheribavta]. Rabba bar Oferan said in the name of Rabbi Elazar, who heard it from his teacher, who in turn heard it from his teacher: The scepter was stretched two hundred cubits.

The verse states: ''Then the king said to her'' (Esther 5:3), to Esther the queen, ''What is your wish, even to half the kingdom, it shall be performed'' (Esther 5:6). The Gemara comments that Ahasuerus intended only a limited offer: Only half the kingdom, but not the whole kingdom, and not something that would serve as a barrier to the kingdom, as there is one thing to which the kingdom will never agree. And what is that? The building of the Temple; if that shall be your wish, realize that it will not be fulfilled.

The verse states that Esther requested: ''If it seem good unto the king, let the king and Haman come this day to the banquet that I have prepared for him'' (Esther 5:4). The Sages taught in a baraita: What did Esther see to invite Haman to the banquet? Rabbi Elazar says: She hid a snare for him, as it is stated: ''Let their table become a snare before them'' (Psalms 69:23), as she assumed that she would be able to trip up Haman during the banquet.

Rabbi Yehoshua says: She learned to do this from the Jewish teachings of her father’s house, as it is stated: ''If your enemy be hungry, give him bread to eat'' (Proverbs 25:21). Rabbi Meir says: She invited him in order that he be near her at all times, so that he would not take counsel and rebel against Ahasuerus when he discovered that the king was angry with him.

Rabbi Yehuda says: She invited Haman so that it not be found out that she was a Jew, as had she distanced him, he would have become suspicious. Rabbi Neḥemya says: She did this so that the Jewish people would not say: We have a sister in the king’s house, and consequently neglect their prayers for divine mercy. Rabbi Yosei says: She acted in this manner, so that Haman would always be on hand for her, as that would enable her to find an opportunity to cause him to stumble before the king. Rabbi Shimon ben Menasya said that Esther said to herself: Perhaps the Omnipresent will take notice that all are supporting Haman and nobody is supporting the Jewish people, and He will perform for us a miracle.

Rabbi Yehoshua ben Korḥa says: She said to herself: I will act kindly toward him and thereby bring the king to suspect that we are having an affair; she did so in order that both he and she would be killed. Essentially, Esther was willing to be killed with Haman in order that the decree would be annulled. Rabban Gamliel says: Ahasuerus was a fickle king, and Esther hoped that if he saw Haman on multiple occasions, eventually he would change his opinion of him. Rabban Gamliel said: We still need the words of Rabbi Eliezer HaModa’i to understand why Esther invited Haman to her banquet. As it is taught in a baraita: Rabbi Eliezer HaModa’i says: She made the king jealous of him and she made the other ministers jealous of him, and in this way she brought about his downfall.

Rabba says: Esther invited Haman to her banquet in order to fulfill that which is stated: ''Pride goes before destruction'' (Proverbs 16:18), which indicates that in order to destroy the wicked, one must first bring them to pride. It can be understood according to Abaye and Rava, who both say that she invited Haman in order to fulfill the verse: ''When they are heated, I will make feasts for them, and I will make them drunk, that they may rejoice, and sleep a perpetual sleep'' (Jeremiah 51:39). The Gemara relates that Rabba bar Avuh once happened upon Elijah the Prophet and said to him: In accordance with whose understanding did Esther see fit to act in this manner? What was the true reason behind her invitation? He, Elijah, said to him: Esther was motivated by all the reasons previously mentioned and did so for all the reasons previously stated by the tanna’im and all the reasons stated by the amora’im.

The verse states: ''And Haman recounted to them the glory of his riches, and the multitude of his sons'' (Esther 5:11). The Gemara asks: And how many sons did he in fact have that are referred to as ''the multitude of his sons''? Rav said: There were thirty sons; ten of them died in childhood, ten of them were hanged as recorded in the book of Esther, and ten survived and were forced to beg at other people’s doors.

And the Rabbis say: Those that begged at other people’s doors numbered seventy, as it is written: ''Those that were full, have hired themselves out for bread'' (I Samuel 2:5). Do not read it as: ''Those that were full'' [seve’im]; rather, read it as seventy [shivim], indicating that there were seventy who ''hired themselves out for bread.''

And Rami bar Abba said: All of Haman’s sons together numbered two hundred and eight, as it is stated: ''And the multitude [verov] of his sons.'' The numerical value of the word verov equals two hundred and eight, alluding to the number of his sons. The Gemara comments: But in fact, the numerical value [gimatriyya] of the word verov equals two hundred and fourteen, not two hundred and eight. Rav Naḥman bar Yitzḥak said: The word verov is written in the Bible without the second vav, and therefore its numerical value equals two hundred and eight.

The verse states: ''On that night the sleep of the king was disturbed'' (Esther 6:1). Rabbi Tanḥum said: The verse alludes to another king who could not sleep; the sleep of the King of the universe, the Holy One, Blessed be He, was disturbed. And the Sages say: The sleep of the higher ones, the angels, was disturbed, and the sleep of the lower ones, the Jewish people, was disturbed. Rava said: This should be understood literally: The sleep of King Ahasuerus was disturbed.

And this was the reason Ahasuerus could not sleep: A thought occurred to him and he said to himself: What is this before us that Esther has invited Haman? Perhaps they are conspiring against that man, i.e., against me, to kill him. He then said again to himself: If this is so, is there no man who loves me and would inform me of this conspiracy? He then said again to himself: Perhaps there is some man who has done a favor for me and I have not properly rewarded him, and due to that reason people refrain from revealing to me information regarding such plots, as they see no benefit for themselves. Immediately afterward, the verse states: ''And he commanded the book of remembrances of the chronicles to be brought'' (Esther 6:1).

The verse states: ''And they were read before the king'' (Esther 6:1). The Gemara explains that this passive form: ''And they were read,'' teaches that they were read miraculously by themselves. It further says: ''And it was found written [katuv]'' (Esther 6:2). The Gemara asks: Why does the Megilla use the word katuv, which indicates that it was newly written? It should have said: A writing [ketav] was found, which would indicate that it had been written in the past. The Gemara explains: This teaches